A high school diploma is necessary to be a high school coach. Further, no one with a felony conviction can be a high school coach. Thus, Joe, a writer with both a high school diploma and a bachelor's degree, can't be a high school coach, since he has a felony conviction. The argument's conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

Joe was an athlete in high school.

Only people eligible for the coaching position are accepted.

Joe would become a high school coach if he didn't have a felony conviction.

Joe's felony conviction is relevant to the duties of high school coaching.

Answer:
Only people eligible for the coaching position are accepted.

Note: This Question is unanswered, help us to find answer for this one